THIS ADVERT SPACE IS AVAILABLE. CONTACT +2348036986103 NOW (CALL, SMS OR WHATSAPP) or Email: theforefrontng@gmail.com

Wednesday, 12 July 2017

And Europe rights court bans full veil in public

Chinese city of Xinjiang

The European Court of Human Rights on Tuesday upheld a Belgian ban on wearing the full-face niqab veil in public, calling the restriction “necessary in a democratic society”.
The veil is controversial across Europe, with some countries banning the garment in public in the name of safety and rights groups arguing that this amounts to a violation of civil liberties.

The court ruled that the ban sought to guarantee social cohesion, the “protection of the rights and freedoms of others” and that it was “necessary in a democratic society”, a statement said.
The EU’s top rights court said a bye-law adopted in June 2008 in three Belgian municipalities “could be regarded as proportionate to the aim pursued, namely the preservation of the conditions of ‘living together’.”
It said a country should also be given a “wide margin of appreciation in deciding whether and to what extent a limitation of the right to manifest one’s religion or beliefs was ‘necessary’.”
Belgian banned the wearing of the full-face veil in June 2011. It prohibits appearing in public “with a face masked or hidden, in whole or in part, in such a way as to be unidentifiable”.
Violations can result in fines and up to seven days in jail.
In May 2012, pockets of riots broke out in the Brussels suburb of Molenbeek after a woman in a niqab was asked by two police officers to remove the garment.
France was the first European country to ban the niqab in April 2011 and there have been around 1,600 arrests since coming in to force.
The ECHR had already ruled on a challenge to the French law in 2014 when it also rejected arguments that the restriction breached religious freedom and individual human rights.
The Belgian case was brought by two Muslim women, Samia Belcacemi, a Belgian national, and Yamina Oussar, a Moroccan.
Both women said they chose of their own free will to wear the niqab and claimed their rights had been infringed and the law was discriminatory.
The court rejected this on Tuesday, saying that the law was designed to ensure “public safety, equality between men and women and a certain concept of living together in a society.”
After Belgium introduced the ban, Belcacemi continued wearing the veil for a while but stopped because of social pressure and fears she would be fined.
Oussar told the court that she had decided to stay at home, the statement from the court said.

LIKE US ON FACEBOOK  

FOLLOW US ON:
>BBM Channel: C002CB006 {WELCOME TO THE FOREFRONT
>{Instagram: the_forefront_nigeria }

Connect with Joshua Osagie (Blog owner)
 > facebook  (fan page) 
 > twitter
 > Instagram: osagiejoshua

Share this post with others on social media with options below.


JOIN OUR FACEBOOK PAGE FEED DOWN THE SITE (SWITCH TO WEB VIEW FOR PAGE UPDATES)

No comments: